Assessing the National Library of Medicine’s Informationist Awards
Abstract
Objective: To understand the experience of the informationist recipients of NLM-funded Administrative Supplements for Informationist Services and gather evidence for their impact on NIH-funded biomedical research
Methods: A mixed methods approach consisting of a survey of principal investigators and a focus group of informationists.
Results: Informationists appeared to have a positive impact on their team’s research, especially in the areas of data storage, data management planning, data organization, and literature searching. In addition, many informationists felt that their involvement increased their research skills and made them true research partners. Assessing their own impact was a challenge for the award recipients, and questions remain about the best evaluation methods. The overall experience of the informationists and researchers was mixed but largely positive.
Conclusion: The NLM-funded informationist supplement award appears to be a successful mechanism for immersing informationists into research teams and improving data management in the supported projects.
Keywords: National Library of Medicine, Informationist, data management, data science
How to Cite:
Deardorff, A., MLIS & Florance, V., Ph.D. & VanBiervliet, A., Ph.D., (2016) “Assessing the National Library of Medicine’s Informationist Awards”, Journal of eScience Librarianship 5(1): 8. doi: https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1095
Rights:
This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
Publisher Notes
- The HTML and PDF versions of this article were corrected on December 4, 2017 to change the Creative Commons license from CC BY-NC-SA to CC0 at the author's request.
Downloads:
Download PDF